Vice President Kashim Shettima’s recent visit to Kwara State has drawn criticism from leaders in Kwara North over his decision not to visit Woro and Nuku, two communities affected by insecurity. Instead, traditional and local government officials from the areas were brought to Ilorin to meet him, a move critics say weakened the message of federal concern at a sensitive time.
Residents and local figures argue that the choice carried strong symbolic weight. They say crisis response is measured not only by statements and meetings, but by physical presence. In their view, asking affected communities to travel to meet federal officials reverses the expected role of leadership during emergencies.
Supporters of this position point to past examples, including the Vice President’s visit to Mokwa following a similar incident. During that visit, he met residents on site and assessed conditions directly. The contrast has raised questions about consistency in federal responses to crises across different regions.
The criticism centers on fears of unequal treatment. Community leaders warn that selective engagement can deepen feelings of exclusion in rural areas, especially in Kwara North, where complaints of marginalisation have persisted for years. They argue that uneven federal attention risks eroding public trust and worsening regional grievances.
Comparisons have also been drawn with international practice, where national leaders often visit disaster or conflict zones in person. Advocates say such visits signal responsibility and solidarity, and help leaders understand local needs beyond official briefings.
Citing Section 14(2)(b) of the Nigerian Constitution, which states that the security and welfare of the people are the primary purpose of government, critics stress that this obligation applies equally to all citizens. They argue that federal actions should reflect this principle in both policy and conduct.
In a statement, Hon. Zakari Mohammed, called on the Vice President to visit Woro and Nuku directly, meet affected residents, and support relief and recovery efforts. He said meaningful leadership requires equal compassion and visible engagement, especially during moments of community hardship.
